Richard Davies wrote: The UK has a good crop of technology pioneers in cloud computing - for example ElasticHosts, FlexiScale, Flexiant, OnApp - and also some strong government initiatives such as G-Cloud.
We will have to see whether this kind of technical leadership converts into swift mass-market adoption or not.
My southern mother had all kinds of cute sayings about life and the pursuit. This one came to mind this morning.
"You get more flies with Sugar than you do with Vinegar".
I
was chatting with an associate about a client of his who is in a
battle with another vendor at a customer site. There's lots of finger
pointing about who was causing which problem. In the meantime the
customer is stuck in the middle as his business grinds to a pace that
even tortoise land would view as slow.
My buddy was frustrated with their approach, so he'd called me more to vent than anything.
From his client's perspective there were only two solutions:
Get proactive. This sounded exactly like the right option
until I learned what they meant. To them, proactive meant 'slinging
mud' and 'FUD' at the other vendor. I thought he was kidding, but it
turns out he wasn't. It truly was (and is) a strategy on the
table. Point the finger and focus on proving that the other vendor was
at fault. Now that's helpful to the customer, isn't it?
Be reactive: After the proactive approach I figured this
one had to be better. Wrong. This approach basically meant they would
say as little as possible about anything to the customer or the other
vendor, lay low and see how things worked out. Basically, the vendor
would play ostrich with his customer.
Where's the customer focus?
I was
floored. I honestly didn't think anyone thought this way anymore. But
obviously some do - which is why I brought the SoapBox out.
Is anyone thinking about the customer and the business impact this little vendor game is having?
Are they focusing energy on finding a solution instead of just covering their tails?
Are they taking an honest, open, partnering approach to handling this situation?
In case you're wondering, the answers are No, No and No.
This
vendor has an option to be honest, open and direct with the customer.
Instead, this company is focused on proving that it's not to blame and
potentially starting a war with the other vendor.
They focused on Covering Their Butts.
This
situation is a GREAT opportunity to create a stronger partnering
relationship with the customer. This vendor could join forces with the
other vendor and the customer's team - and show that customer that
their business success is more important than any corporate ego. It's
the chance to tell the truth and gain credibility.
The chance for honesty and partnering is long gone.
I
bet the flies do come even with this 'vinegar' approach.
They'll show up to buzz the vendor's carcass after the
customer shoots them dead.
About Rebel Brown For over twenty years, Rebel Brown has positioned and repositioned technology companies for high-velocity growth. She’s recognized for her expertise in business and market strategy, corporate and product positioning and go-to-market launches. Rebel’s best selling market strategy book, Defy Gravity, is a guide to creating Powerful Market Positions in today’s new economy. Rebel has been featured in media including Forbes, Entrepreneur, Inc, Business Insider, Startup Nation, ChangeThis.com, First Business TV, Exceptional People and more.
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice: