Richard Davies wrote: The UK has a good crop of technology pioneers in cloud computing - for example ElasticHosts, FlexiScale, Flexiant, OnApp - and also some strong government initiatives such as G-Cloud.
We will have to see whether this kind of technical leadership converts into swift mass-market adoption or not.
NEW YORK, NY -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 10/12/05 -- Abraham Fruchter & Twersky LLP today announced
that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of purchasers of
Barrier Therapeutics Inc. ("Barrier" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: BTRX)
common stock during the period between April 29, 2004, and June 29, 2005,
inclusive (the "Class Period").
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must meet certain legal
requirements set forth in the applicable law and file appropriate papers
with the Court by July 18, 2005. You do not need to seek appointment as a
lead plaintiff in order to share in any recovery. Under certain
circumstances, one or more Class members may together serve as lead
plaintiff. You may retain Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP, or other
counsel of your choice, to serve as your counsel in this action or you may
choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. If you have any
questions concerning this case or your rights or interests with respect to
this matter, please contact plaintiff's counsel: Jack G. Fruchter, Esq. or
Ximena Skovron, Esq. of Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP, One Penn Plaza,
Suite 2805, New York, New York 10119, by telephone at (212) 279-5050 or
toll free at (800) 440-8986, by facsimile at (212) 279-3655, or by e-mail
at jfruchter@aftlaw.com or xskovron@aftlaw.com.
The complaint charges Barrier and certain of its officers and directors
with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Barrier is a biopharmaceutical company, engaged in the discovery,
development, and commercialization of pharmaceutical products in the field
of dermatology. The complaint alleges that Barrier made a series of
materially false and misleading statements concerning the Company's
business and products under development. In particular, the Complaint
alleges that these statements were materially false and misleading because
they failed to disclose and misrepresented the following adverse facts: (i)
that the Company had failed to perform its clinical trials in conformity
with FDA guidelines as they had failed to disclose that they had secretly
substituted the petroleum base within Zimycan, the effect of which was to
substantially lessen the likelihood that the drug could achieve FDA
approval; (ii) that Hyphanox did not have a better safety or efficacy
profile than fluconazole/Diflucan and, in fact, as investors ultimately
learned, Hyphanox was significantly less effective than
fluconazole/Diflucan; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing, defendants
lacked any reasonable basis for their positive statements about Barrier.
On June 29, 2005, Barrier shocked the market when it announced, among other
adverse facts, that the Company's drug trials failed to demonstrate that
Hyphanox worked as well as fluconazole. In response to this announcement,
the price of Barrier stock plummeted over $6.75 per share -- a decline of
over 45% -- to below $8.00 per share on extremely heavy trading volume.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of publicly
traded securities of Barrier during the Class Period (the "Class"). The
plaintiff is represented by Abraham Fruchter & Twersky LLP, which has
expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in
actions involving financial fraud.
Jack G. Fruchter, Esq.
Abraham Fruchter & Twersky LLP
(212) 279-5050
(800) 440-8986 toll free
(212) 279-3655 fax Email Contact