SYS-CON MEDIA Authors: Xenia von Wedel, Peter Silva, Glenn Rossman, Ava Smith, Elizabeth White

News Feed Item

DynTek Announces Results for the Third Quarter and Year-to-Date Period Ended March 31, 2014

NEWPORT BEACH, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 04/28/14 -- DynTek, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: DYNE), a leading provider of professional technology services, today announced results for its fiscal year 2014 third quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2014.

Year-to-Date Period Ended March 31, 2014

DynTek reported revenues of $107,114,000 and gross profit of $18,490,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 compared to revenues of $95,648,000 and gross profit of $16,117,000 in the prior year nine months ended March 31, 2013. The $11,466,000 or 12% revenue growth, and the $2,373,000 or 15% gross profit growth, are primarily attributable to several multi-million dollar deals with government customers in the New York district and government and commercial customers in the Newport Beach district in the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

Total operating expenses were $14,805,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $12,892,000 in the prior year nine months ended March 31, 2013. The $1,913,000 or 15% increase year over year is primarily due to sales commissions on higher revenue levels and investments in additional sales representatives.

DynTek reported EBITDA of $4,092,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $3,472,000 in the prior year nine months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $620,000 or 18% year over year. Net income was $2,768,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2014, or $1.26 per diluted share, an increase of $178,000 or $0.03 per diluted share, over net income of $2,590,000 or $1.23 per diluted share, in the nine months ended March 31, 2013.

Third Fiscal Year 2014 Quarter Ended March 31, 2014

DynTek reported revenues of $26,834,00 and gross profit of $4,901,000 for the third fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to revenues of $27,429,000 and gross profit of $5,047,000 in the prior year third fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013. Total operating expenses were $4,424,000 in the third fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared to $4,208,000 in the prior year third quarter ended March 31, 2013.

DynTek reported EBITDA of $725,000 for the third fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to $919,000 in the prior year third quarter, a decrease of $194,000 or 21%. Net income was $206,000 for the third fiscal quarter of 2014, or $0.09 per diluted share, a decrease of $656,000 or $0.32 per diluted share, over net income of $862,000 or $0.41 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2013.

"We have had strong year-to-date growth across our regions and technology practices," said Ron Ben-Yishay, DynTek's chief executive officer. "We continue to focus on the growth and expansion of our cloud offerings and managed services, which present new and innovative ways for our customers to leverage technology as a service. In addition, as new security attacks continue to burden the market, we expect continued growth in our security services, which provide our customers with new, sophisticated lines of defense from next generation security threats."

EBITDA
The Company defines EBITDA as net income from operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation. Other companies may calculate EBITDA differently. Although EBITDA is a widely used financial indicator of a company's ability to service debt, it is not a recognized measure for financial statement presentation under generally accepted accounting procedures (GAAP). EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as superior or as an alternative to net income or to cash flows from operating activities as determined in accordance with GAAP. Nonetheless, the Company believes that EBITDA provides useful supplemental information for investors and others to measure operating performance, especially in situations where a company has significant non-cash operating expenses that are not indicative of core business operating results. EBITDA is widely used in the IT services industry to analyze comparable company performance, and management of the Company also uses EBITDA, in addition to GAAP information, as a measure of operating performance for assessing its business units.

About DynTek
DynTek is a leading provider of professional technology services to mid-market companies, such as state and local governments, educational institutions and commercial entities in the largest IT markets nationwide. From virtualization and cloud computing to unified communications and collaboration, DynTek provides professional technology solutions across the three core areas of our customers' technical environment: Infrastructure/Data Center, Microsoft Platforms, End Point Computing. DynTek's multidisciplinary approach allows our clients to turn to a single source for their most critical technology requirements. For more information, visit http://www.dyntek.com.

Follow Us Online:
Twitter: @DynTek
DynTek on Facebook
DynTek on LinkedIn

Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements made in this press release, such as statements relating to the effect that the adoption of the revolving line of credit will have on our business and our intended use of funds borrowed under the revolving line of credit, involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to materially differ from the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, our success in reaching target markets for services and products in a highly competitive market; our ability to maintain existing customers and attract future customers; our ability to finance and sustain operations, including our ability to comply with the terms of the revolving line of credit and the Company's other existing and future indebtedness; our ability to achieve profitability and positive cash flow from operations; our ability to maintain business relationships with IT product vendors; the size and timing of additional significant orders for our products and services and our ability to fulfill such orders; the continuing desire of state and local governments to outsource to private contractors and the availability of budgets to place orders for our products and services; our ability to retain skilled professional staff and certain key executives; the performance of our government and commercial technology services; and the continuation of general economic and business conditions that are conducive to outsourcing of IT services. We have no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.


                        DYNTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
              CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                           (EBITDA presentation)
         (Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)

                           Quarter    Nine Months    Quarter    Nine Months
                            Ended        Ended        Ended        Ended
                          March 31,    March 31,    March 31,    March 31,
                             2014         2014         2013         2013
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

REVENUES
  Product revenues       $    18,642  $    83,315  $    19,337  $    70,908
  Service revenues             8,192       23,799        8,093       24,740
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
  TOTAL REVENUES              26,834      107,114       27,429       95,648
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

COST OF REVENUES
  Cost of products            15,675       69,662       15,877       59,816
  Cost of services             6,258       18,962        6,505       19,715
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
  TOTAL COST OF REVENUES      21,933       88,624       22,382       79,530
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
GROSS PROFIT                   4,901       18,490        5,047       16,117
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

OPERATING EXPENSES:
  Selling                      3,461       11,646        3,199        9,669
  General and
   administrative                936        3,094          986        3,149
  Depreciation and
   amortization                   27           65           23           74
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
  TOTAL OPERATING
   EXPENSES                    4,424       14,805        4,208       12,892
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS           477        3,685          839        3,225

EBITDA                           725        4,092          919        3,472

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense                (254)        (681)        (225)        (693)
Other income (expense),
 net                               -            -            9            9
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
  TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE           (254)        (681)        (216)        (684)
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

INCOME BEFORE INCOME
 TAXES                           223        3,004          623        2,541
Income tax (provision)
 benefit                         (17)        (236)         239           48
                         -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

NET INCOME               $       206  $     2,768  $       862  $     2,590
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

NET INCOME PER SHARE:
  Basic                  $      0.10  $      1.30  $      0.41  $      1.24
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========
  Diluted                $      0.09  $      1.26  $      0.41  $      1.23
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
 OF SHARES:
  Basic                    2,127,601    2,126,490    2,094,202    2,091,836
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========
  Diluted                  2,216,261    2,188,860    2,121,708    2,112,829
                         ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========


For more information, contact:
Linda Ford
DynTek, Inc.
949-271-6705
Email Contact

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will w...
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective ...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happe...
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrateg...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water,...
DevOps is all about agility. However, you don't want to be on a high-speed bus to nowhere. The right DevOps approach controls velocity with a tight feedback loop that not only consists of operational data but also incorporates business context. With a business context in the decision making, the right business priorities are incorporated, which results in a higher value creation. In his session at DevOps Summit, Todd Rader, Solutions Architect at AppDynamics, discussed key monitoring techniques...
Want to enable self-service provisioning of application environments in minutes that mirror production? Can you automatically provide rich data with code-level detail back to the developers when issues occur in production? In his session at DevOps Summit, David Tesar, Microsoft Technical Evangelist on Microsoft Azure and DevOps, will discuss how to accomplish this and more utilizing technologies such as Microsoft Azure, Visual Studio online, and Application Insights in this demo-heavy session.
When an enterprise builds a hybrid IaaS cloud connecting its data center to one or more public clouds, security is often a major topic along with the other challenges involved. Security is closely intertwined with the networking choices made for the hybrid cloud. Traditional networking approaches for building a hybrid cloud try to kludge together the enterprise infrastructure with the public cloud. Consequently this approach requires risky, deep "surgery" including changes to firewalls, subnets...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device exp...
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect...
High-performing enterprise Software Quality Assurance (SQA) teams validate systems that are ready for use - getting most actively involved as components integrate and form complete systems. These teams catch and report on defects, making sure the customer gets the best software possible. SQA teams have leveraged automation and virtualization to execute more thorough testing in less time - bringing Dev and Ops together, ensuring production readiness. Does the emergence of DevOps mean the end of E...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using ...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series dat...