SYS-CON MEDIA Authors: Adine Deford, Cynthia Dunlop, Harry Trott, Xenia von Wedel, Peter Silva

News Feed Item

“Save GrafTech” Asks Shareholders to Consider Important Facts about Incumbent Board of Directors

Save GrafTech, an investor group led by Nathan Milikowsky, a holder of over 15 million shares of GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE: GTI), or over 11.2% of the Company’s common stock, is sending a letter to GrafTech’s shareholders outlining seven important facts about GrafTech and its incumbent Board, which has overseen severe and prolonged shareholder value destruction.

Save GrafTech believes that change at the Board level is necessary to rectify the strategic, operational and cultural issues facing GrafTech and urges shareholders to vote their BLUE proxy card FOR all of Save GrafTech’s director nominees today. Save GrafTech’s proxy statement and detailed presentation are available at www.sec.gov and www.SaveGrafTech.com.

Included below is the full text of the letter to GrafTech’s shareholders:

April 28, 2014

Dear Fellow GrafTech Shareholder:

We write to you again on behalf of the “Save GrafTech” investor group less than three weeks before GrafTech’s Annual Meeting on May 15. As you decide which director nominees deserve your support, we ask you to consider seven important facts about GrafTech that are outlined in the attached.

GrafTech’s incumbent directors have overseen severe and prolonged shareholder value destruction, and we firmly believe that change at the Board level is necessary to rectify the strategic, operational and cultural issues facing GrafTech -- and to get the Company back on a path of creating value for you.

Save GrafTech is asking you to support our three highly qualified independent candidates for election to GrafTech’s Board. David Jardini, Karen Finerman and Nathan Milikowsky collectively have the industry experience and financial acumen to drive productive discussions about issues impacting the business and generate ideas that will create lasting value for shareholders. If elected, we would immediately work hand-in-hand with GrafTech’s other directors to revitalize a company that is capable of competing effectively and generating strong cash flows across the business cycle.

Our proxy statement and presentation are available at www.sec.gov and www.SaveGrafTech.com. We urge you to vote your BLUE proxy card FOR all three of Save GrafTech’s director nominees today.

Your Vote Is Important, No Matter How Many Shares You Own.

 

If you have questions about how to vote your shares on the BLUE proxy card,

or need additional assistance, please contact the firm assisting us in the proxy solicitation:
 

D.F. King & Co., Inc.

Shareholders Call Toll-Free: (800) 628-8532
Banks and Brokers Call Collect: (212) 269-5550

Email: [email protected]

 

IMPORTANT

WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN ANY WHITE PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY GRAFTECH

SEVEN FACTS ALL GRAFTECH SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD CONSIDER

1. GrafTech Has a Track Record of Severe Underperformance.

The starkest example of GrafTech’s underperformance under the incumbent Board is its dreadful long-term total shareholder return (TSR). Over the past 10 years, GrafTech’s TSR has been negative 15.1%. This means it has destroyed, not created, shareholder return over the past decade. And compared with its peers, GrafTech has underperformed by over 200% over the last 10 years.

GrafTech’s first quarter earnings report on April 24 was more of the same – optimistic rhetoric about the future with little or no progress to show. The Company reported a net loss for the quarter of $12 million, or 8 cents per share, compared to a net profit of $4 million, or 3 cents per share, in the first quarter of 2013. Even excluding costs associated with the closing of electrode plants in Brazil and South Africa and a machine shop in Russia, GrafTech still only posted adjusted net income of $1 million, or $0.01 per share. Notably, this number would have been negative without an insurance recovery of $3 million, or $0.02 per share, in the first quarter.

Why has GrafTech repeatedly delivered disappointing results and prolonged underperformance?
Because its approach to running the business is fundamentally wrong and outdated.

2. Bad Governance -- The Board Protected the Former CEO as a “Whistleblower.”

As a director, in September 2012, Nathan Milikowsky urged that Craig Shular be replaced as CEO given the Company’s record of abysmal performance. The GrafTech Board’s response was to claim that the CEO could not be fired because he was a “whistleblower.” And who did he “blow the whistle” on? Conveniently, Nathan Milikowsky, who was seeking his ouster. We challenge GrafTech to name another public company that has accorded whistleblower protection to its CEO.

3. Abysmal Governance -- The Board Wasted Millions of Dollars on a Retaliatory Investigation.

To justify the Board’s convenient bestowing of “whistleblower protection” to the CEO and to retaliate against Nathan Milikowsky, the Board, at the cost of millions of shareholder dollars in legal fees, hired a law firm to conduct an investigation. Inexplicably, this investigation did not include interviewing Nathan Milikowsky, as his meeting with investigatory counsel was scheduled to take place after their investigation had been concluded. Given the absence of proof of wrongdoing produced by the investigation, Save GrafTech offered the Board the opportunity to validate the results of that investigation by appointing an independent counsel to evaluate those findings. In response, the Board backed off the earlier investigation. Instead, the Board demanded a brand new, expensive, time-consuming, litigation-oriented investigation with yet another law firm. Why would a second investigation be necessary if the Board believes that the first one justified removing and now barring Nathan Milikowsky from the Board?

4. The Company has Stonewalled any Possible Settlement.

Save GrafTech has repeatedly tried to reach a reasonable resolution. For example, Save GrafTech reduced its original request for five directors on a nine-member board to an offer of three Save GrafTech nominees on a nine-member board, with a two-year standstill. GrafTech has flatly and promptly rejected each of Save GrafTech’s settlement offers.

5. The Board Needs New Leadership.

Save GrafTech seeks the long overdue replacement of Mary Cranston, GrafTech’s lead director since 2008 and designee as Chairperson, who has been on the Board for over 14 years. Why is it important that Mary Cranston be replaced? GrafTech’s designated future Chairperson knows little about the graphite and steel industry and has presided over massive value destruction at GrafTech. She also serves on too many other boards (six) and has a history of unsuccessful leadership and launching smear campaigns. Her efforts to manage a law firm were a failure and she stepped down in the wake of ongoing, disappointing financial performance.1

One notable incident as head of that firm was the disgraceful smearing of one of her former partners. After Ms. Cranston’s law firm was sued for $40 million for libeling and attempting to sabotage his career, she issued a humiliating public apology in connection with a large settlement, which read:

“Pillsbury Winthrop deeply regrets making its public statements regarding Frode Jensen and has agreed to a settlement with Mr. Jensen regarding those statements. Mr. Jensen was a valued and respected member of the firm and was one of the firm’s most productive corporate partners. Mr. Jensen is an accomplished corporate transactional lawyer, and he made many important contributions during his tenure at the firm. Pillsbury wishes him well in all his future endeavors and employment opportunities.”

If GrafTech is so eager to conduct an investigation, it should start by demanding that Ms. Cranston disclose the amount of the payment her firm had to make to her former partner for her wrongdoing.

6. The Board’s Entrenchment is Simply More of the Same.

GrafTech has conveniently included in its credit agreement a “dead hand poison put” designed to protect the incumbent Board while seriously damaging the company. If shareholders elect a majority of directors NOT handpicked by the Board, then the lenders would be able to accelerate all outstanding debt and terminate their commitments to extend further credit, all without any cure period or cleansing act. While this provision would not be triggered if Save GrafTech’s three nominees gain minority representation on the Board, the lengths to which the incumbent Board will go to preserve the status quo are notable and clearly not in the best interests of shareholders.

The GrafTech Board has also flatly rejected Save GrafTech’s request for a universal proxy. Its reason? “[T]he use of a universal proxy card is not in the best interest of stockholders.” Why not? The universal proxy card is clearly not in the best interest of incumbent directors with nominal ownership in the Company.

7. It is Crucial That All Three Save GrafTech Nominees be Elected.

Having as many shareholder voices as possible on the Board is the best way to change the unprofitable, entrenched, shareholder unfriendly culture at GrafTech. If fewer than three of Save GrafTech’s nominees are elected, change will be significantly harder to achieve and may take far longer (if it happens at all).

Your Vote Is Important, No Matter How Many Shares You Own.

 

If you have questions about how to vote your shares on the BLUE proxy card,

or need additional assistance, please contact the firm assisting us in the proxy solicitation:
 

D.F. King & Co., Inc.

Shareholders Call Toll-Free: (800) 628-8532

Banks and Brokers Call Collect: (212) 269-5550

Email: [email protected]

 

IMPORTANT

WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN ANY WHITE PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY GRAFTECH

On April 15, 2014 Nathan Milikowsky, Daniel Milikowsky, NM GTI Investments LLC, The Daniel Milikowsky Family Holdings, LLC, The Daniel and Sharon Milikowsky Family Foundation, Inc., and The Rebecca and Nathan Milikowsky Family Foundation (collectively, “Save GrafTech”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and began distributing to the stockholders of GrafTech International, Ltd. (the “Company”) a definitive proxy statement and form of proxy (the “Proxy Statement”) in connection with the Company’s 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. SAVE GRAFTECH STRONGLY ADVISES ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY TO THE PROXY STATEMENT BECAUSE IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE SAVE GRAFTECH’S PARTICIPANTS IN SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION. SAVE GRAFTECH’S PROXY STATEMENT, AS FILED, AND ANY FURTHER AMENDMENTS, SUPPLEMENTS OR OTHER RELEVANT PROXY SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE ON THE SEC’S WEB SITE AT WWW.SEC.GOV, OR BY CONTACTING D.F. KING & CO., INC. BY TELEPHONE AT THE FOLLOWING NUMBERS: BANKS AND BROKERS CALL COLLECT: (212) 269-5550 AND ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING SHAREHOLDERS, CALL TOLL-FREE: (800) 628-8532.

1

 

“Pillsbury Chair Cranston Set to Step Down,” The Recorder, January 27, 2006, available at: http://www.alm.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1138269918562&slreturn=20140309151043.

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
"We help companies that are using a lot of Software as a Service. We help companies manage and gain visibility into what people are using inside the company and decide to secure them or use standards to lock down or to embrace the adoption of SaaS inside the company," explained Scott Kriz, Co-founder and CEO of Bitium, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 15th Cloud Expo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
15th Cloud Expo, which took place Nov. 4-6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, expanded the conference content of @ThingsExpo, Big Data Expo, and DevOps Summit to include two developer events. IBM held a Bluemix Developer Playground on November 5 and ElasticBox held a Hackathon on November 6. Both events took place on the expo floor. The Bluemix Developer Playground, for developers of all levels, highlighted the ease of use of Bluemix, its services and functionalit...
Some developers believe that monitoring is a function of the operations team. Some operations teams firmly believe that monitoring the systems they maintain is sufficient to run the business successfully. Most of them are wrong. The complexity of today's applications have gone far and beyond the capabilities of "traditional" system-level monitoring tools and approaches and requires much broader knowledge of business and applications as a whole. The goal of DevOps is to connect all aspects of app...
The 4th International DevOps Summit, co-located with16th International Cloud Expo – being held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY – announces that its Call for Papers is now open. Born out of proven success in agile development, cloud computing, and process automation, DevOps is a macro trend you cannot afford to miss. From showcase success stories from early adopters and web-scale businesses, DevOps is expanding to organizations of all sizes, including the world's large...
SAP is delivering break-through innovation combined with fantastic user experience powered by the market-leading in-memory technology, SAP HANA. In his General Session at 15th Cloud Expo, Thorsten Leiduck, VP ISVs & Digital Commerce, SAP, discussed how SAP and partners provide cloud and hybrid cloud solutions as well as real-time Big Data offerings that help companies of all sizes and industries run better. SAP launched an application challenge to award the most innovative SAP HANA and SAP HANA...
Want to enable self-service provisioning of application environments in minutes that mirror production? Can you automatically provide rich data with code-level detail back to the developers when issues occur in production? In his session at DevOps Summit, David Tesar, Microsoft Technical Evangelist on Microsoft Azure and DevOps, will discuss how to accomplish this and more utilizing technologies such as Microsoft Azure, Visual Studio online, and Application Insights in this demo-heavy session.
When an enterprise builds a hybrid IaaS cloud connecting its data center to one or more public clouds, security is often a major topic along with the other challenges involved. Security is closely intertwined with the networking choices made for the hybrid cloud. Traditional networking approaches for building a hybrid cloud try to kludge together the enterprise infrastructure with the public cloud. Consequently this approach requires risky, deep "surgery" including changes to firewalls, subnets...
DevOps is all about agility. However, you don't want to be on a high-speed bus to nowhere. The right DevOps approach controls velocity with a tight feedback loop that not only consists of operational data but also incorporates business context. With a business context in the decision making, the right business priorities are incorporated, which results in a higher value creation. In his session at DevOps Summit, Todd Rader, Solutions Architect at AppDynamics, discussed key monitoring techniques...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water,...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, a...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series dat...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happe...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and asse...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!