SYS-CON MEDIA Authors: Xenia von Wedel, Peter Silva, Glenn Rossman, Ava Smith, Elizabeth White

News Feed Item

Bank of the James Reports First Quarter 2014 Financial Results

Expanded Operations Contribute to Record Asset, Loan, Deposit Levels

LYNCHBURG, VA -- (Marketwired) -- 04/29/14 -- Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BOTJ), the parent company of Bank of the James, a full-service commercial and retail bank serving the Greater Lynchburg MSA, commonly known as "Region 2000" and other markets in Central Virginia, today announced unaudited results for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Performance Highlights

  • Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $705,000 or $0.21 per diluted share, compared with $788,000 or $0.24 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
  • Net interest income after provision for loan losses increased to $3.90 million in first quarter 2014 compared with $3.69 million in first quarter 2013, reflecting modest loan income growth, interest expense reduction, and a lower provision for loan losses compared with the prior year's first quarter.
  • Total assets increased to a company-record $442.58 million at March 31, 2014 compared with $428.09 million at March 31, 2013 and up from $434.51 million at December 31, 2013.
  • Total loans (including loans held for sale), net of allowance for loan losses, rose to $350.99 million at March 31, 2014 -- highest in the company's history -- compared with $326.31 million at March 31, 2013 and $341.92 million at December 31, 2013, primarily reflecting continued growth in commercial real estate lending and selectively retained residential mortgages.
  • Owner-occupied and investor-owned real estate loan totals increased 11% at March 31, 2014 compared with totals in first quarter 2013.
  • The bank added 13 new commercial relationships with loans of $200,000 or more during first quarter 2014.
  • Deposits grew to a record $398.13 million at March 31, 2014 compared with $385.19 million at March 31, 2013 and $387.40 million at December 31, 2013. The year-over-year increase primarily reflected a 13.3% growth in noninterest bearing demand deposit accounts (DDAs).
  • The company continued to demonstrate strong asset quality, with nonperforming assets to total assets of 1.13% in first quarter 2014 compared with 1.95% in first quarter 2013, reflecting continued asset quality improvement. The ratio of nonaccruing loans to total loans was 0.93% at March 31, 2014 compared with 1.82% at March 31, 2013.
  • The total dollar amount of nonperforming loans declined to $3.28 million at March 31, 2014 compared with $6.04 million at March 31, 2013.
  • Interest expense management and growth in lower-cost deposits, including business banking demand accounts, contributed to net interest margin stability. The bank reported a net interest margin of 4.01% for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 compared with 4.06% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
  • Reflecting increased shareholder value, total stockholders' equity increased to $31.32 million compared with $29.77 million at December 31, 2013. Book value per share increased to $9.31 per share at March 31, 2014 from $8.94 at March 31, 2013 and $8.85 at December 31, 2013.

Robert R. Chapman III, President and CEO, commented: "Our first quarter 2014 financial performance reflected increased scale and meaningful gains in building the Bank of the James franchise. Our efforts are contributing to increased shareholder value. The first quarter reflected some negative impact related to difficult weather conditions, particularly slower-than-expected residential mortgage activity, yet net income exceeded expectations. Our results also reflected the investments we have made to expand the Bank of the James franchise into new markets.

"As we grow, we have remained mindful of maintaining the high levels of asset quality the company has demonstrated in past quarters. We have met or exceeded our goals for asset and loan quality, and we will continue competing for high quality opportunities and applying our prudent loan underwriting and risk management practices.

"We entered the second quarter with a robust loan pipeline, representing not only quality credits, but the opportunity to build a complete banking relationship with each new customer. We believe this approach has proven its value through enhanced customer retention and less transient business. This strategy is being demonstrated, for example, by the addition of core deposits and increased use of electronic banking services that are part of a multi-faceted relationship with customers. We believe this business philosophy will remain the driving force behind the bank's success."

First Quarter 2014 Income Statement Highlights

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $705,000 or $0.21 per diluted share, compared with $788,000 or $0.24 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Net income reflected modest growth in total interest income, reduced interest expense and a reduction in the provision for loan losses to $55,000 in first quarter 2014 compared with $235,000 in first quarter 2013.

The company's total interest income, primarily reflecting higher interest income from loans, was $4.55 million in the first quarter 2014 compared with $4.54 million in first quarter 2013. Total interest expense declined to $591,000 at March 31, 2014 compared with $616,000 at March 31, 2013, reflecting interest expense management, including selective re-pricing of higher cost time deposits. This contributed to a decline in expense related to time deposits compared with the first quarter 2013. Net interest income increased to $3.95 million at March 31, 2014 compared with $3.92 million at March 31, 2013.

"We believe that in a continuing low interest rate environment, we have demonstrated the ability to stay ahead of the curve by re-balancing our portfolios to reflect competitive pricing on the deposit side and by obtaining reasonable rates and loan structures on the lending side," explained J. Todd Scruggs, CFO. "We feel holding net interest margin at or near 4% is a significant accomplishment. We were particularly pleased with the growth in noninterest bearing demand deposits, primarily reflecting the continued traction we are getting in our commercial banking relationship business, which is also contributing to a lower cost of funds."

Noninterest income from fees, service charges and commissions, including fees from the bank's expanded line of treasury management services for commercial customers, was $717,000 in first quarter 2014 compared with $964,000 in first quarter 2013. The prior year's first quarter included a $259,000 gain on the sale of securities. Mortgage fee income declined year-over-year, reflecting a slowing of mortgage refinancing activity, partially offset by an increase in purchase mortgage originations. Service charges, fees and commissions increased to $350,000 in first quarter 2014 compared with $303,000 in first quarter 2013. Chapman noted that commercial treasury management services continue to generate increased fee income and provide a key element in relationship-focused commercial banking activities.

Noninterest expense increased 2.21% to $3.61 million at March 31, 2014 compared with $3.53 million at March 31, 2013, primarily reflecting increases in compensation and occupancy expense. The company's efficiency ratio was 77.26% in first quarter 2014 compared with 72.28% in first quarter 2013, primarily reflecting our investment in growth.

"We feel we have effectively maintained the expenses related to our core operations in Region 2000, and have prudently invested in experienced people and cost-effective facilities to build important market presence in the Charlottesville, Roanoke and Appomattox markets," Chapman explained. "As we build our business in these markets, we expect our investments to demonstrate accelerating results that will positively impact our bottom line."

Balance Sheet Highlights and Outlook

Loans (including loans held for sale), net of a $5.26 million allowance for loan losses, were $350.99 million at March 31, 2014 compared with loans, net of a $5.61 allowance for loan losses, of $326.31 million at March 31, 2013. At December 31, 2013 loans (including loans held for sale), net of a $5.19 million allowance for loan losses, were $341.92 million.

"During the past year, we have pursued our goal of diversifying the bank's loan portfolio," Chapman explained. "We have in the past several years added balance to our loan portfolio through increased commercial lending activity and our related deposit and services businesses."

Commercial loans increased to $58.83 million in first quarter 2014 compared with $57.38 million in first quarter 2013, owner-occupied real estate totals rose to $108.81 million compared to $99.40 million in the prior year's first quarter, and investor-owned real estate grew to $107.17 million in first quarter 2014 compared with $95.37 million in the first quarter 2013. Consumer lines of credit increased year-over-year, while consumer and construction loan totals were essentially unchanged compared with the prior year's first quarter.

Total deposits at March 31, 2014 increased to a record $398.13 million compared with $385.19 million at March 31, 2013 and $387.40 million at December 31, 2013. Total assets grew to a company record $442.58 million at March 31, 2014. The company accomplished asset growth while shrinking its portfolio of other owned real estate (OREO) from $2.32 million at March 31, 2013 to $1.71 million at March 31, 2014, reflecting steady disposition of owned properties and few assets being added to OREO.

The company grew its balance sheet while improving asset quality metrics. At March 31, 2014, the company's ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.93%, and its allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.48%, with an allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans of 160.25%. Reflecting improved asset quality, the company's allowance for loan losses declined 6.15% compared with a year ago, and the provision for loan losses declined 76.60% to $55,000 at March 31, 2014 from $235,000 at March 31, 2013. Charge-offs declined 97.85% to $4,000 at March 31, 2014 from $186,000 at March 31, 2013. Recoveries increased from $22,000 at March 31, 2013 to $24,000 at March 31, 2014. The bank's "Texas Ratio" (NPAs + Troubled Debt Restructurings: Capital + Loan Loss Reserve), a measurement of asset quality, was 12.16% at March 31, 2014.

The company's ratio of average equity to average assets increased to 7.31% at March 31, 2014 compared with 6.75% at March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2014, return on average assets (ROAA) was 0.65% compared with ROAA of 0.74% at March 31, 2013, with the decline primarily reflecting the company's larger asset base. Return on average equity was 8.90% in first quarter 2014 compared with 11.02% in first quarter 2013, which management anticipates will improve as new assets become increasingly productive. Total stockholders' equity increased to $31.32 million at March 31, 2014 compared with $29.97 million at March 31, 2013, while the company's book value rose to $9.31 per share compared with $8.94 at March 31, 2013.

The bank remained "well capitalized" by accepted regulatory standards, with an approximate tier 1 to average total assets ratio of 9.29%, an approximate tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 11.97% and an approximate total risk-based capital ratio of 13.22% at March 31, 2014.

Chapman concluded: "We remain encouraged by the slow but steady improvement in the economy, an uptick in business activity and residential housing markets. Like many banks, we have felt the impact of the decline in mortgage refinancing, however, anticipating this slowing, we worked diligently to leverage our longstanding reputation as a purchase mortgage lender to build this business. As a result, purchase mortgage originations comprised 74% of our loan activity during the first quarter. We expect a stronger mortgage business in second quarter 2014 due to the seasonality of the business and the positive impact of warmer weather. The strengthening local real estate market has also enabled us to continue to dispose of bank owned assets at more attractive prices.

"With a broader array of services and capabilities, our team has more opportunities than ever to present a suite of integrated financial solutions to current and potential customers. Working from a firm financial footing, we are enthusiastic about the opportunity to grow Bank of the James and hope to enhance shareholder value in the process."

About the Company

Bank of the James, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc., serves the greater Lynchburg, Virginia MSA, often referred to as Region 2000, and other markets in and around Central Virginia. The bank operates nine full service locations, two loan production offices, and an investment services division. The company is celebrating its 15th anniversary this year. Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. common stock is listed under the symbol "BOTJ" on the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "plan" and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Bank of the James Financial Group (the "Company") undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to competition, general economic conditions, potential changes in interest rates, and changes in the value of real estate securing loans made by Bank of the James (the "Bank"), a subsidiary of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and previously filed by the Bank (as predecessor of the Company) with the Federal Reserve Board.

FINANCIAL TABLES FOLLOW



Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(000's) except ratios and percent data
unaudited

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Three      Three               Year       Year
                 months     months                to         to
                 ending     ending               date       date
                 Mar 31,    Mar 31,             Mar 31,    Mar 31,
Selected Data:    2014       2013     Change     2014       2013     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest
 income        $    4,545 $    4,537    0.18% $    4,545 $    4,537    0.18%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest
 expense              591        616   -4.06%        591        616   -4.06%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest
 income             3,954      3,921    0.84%      3,954      3,921    0.84%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for
 loan losses           55        235  -76.60%         55        235  -76.60%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noninterest
 income               717        964  -25.62%        717        964  -25.62%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noninterest
 expense            3,609      3,531    2.21%      3,609      3,531    2.21%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes          302        331   -8.76%        302        331   -8.76%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income            705        788  -10.53%        705        788  -10.53%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
 average
 shares
 outstanding    3,364,874  3,352,725    0.36%  3,364,874  3,352,725    0.36%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic net
 income per
 share         $     0.21 $     0.24 $ (0.03) $     0.21 $     0.24 $ (0.03)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fully diluted
 net income
 per share     $     0.21 $     0.24 $ (0.03) $     0.21 $     0.24 $ (0.03)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance Sheet     Mar 31,    Dec 31,            Mar 31,    Dec 31,
 at period end:    2014       2013     Change    2013       2012     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans, net      $  349,156 $  339,994   2.69% $  325,510 $  318,754    2.12%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans held for
 sale                1,831      1,921  -4.69%        804        434   85.25%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
 securities         47,871     49,628  -3.54%     48,777     56,471  -13.62%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deposits     398,126    387,398   2.77%    385,194    374,234    2.93%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders'
 equity             31,323     29,772   5.21%     29,972     26,805   11.81%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets       442,584    434,511   1.86%    428,086    441,381   -3.01%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares
 outstanding     3,364,874  3,364,874      -   3,352,725  3,352,725       -
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book value per
 share          $     9.31 $     8.85   0.46  $     8.94 $     7.99 $  0.94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Three      Three              Year       Year
                   months     months               to         to
                   ending     ending              date       date
                   Mar 31,    Mar 31,            Mar 31,    Mar 31,
Daily averages:     2014       2013     Change    2014       2013     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans, net       $  343,392 $  321,431   6.83% $  343,392 $  321,431   6.83%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loans held for
 sale                   634        964 -34.23%        634        964 -34.23%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total securities     51,287     53,003  -3.24%     51,287     53,003  -3.24%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deposits      393,173    387,999   1.33%    393,173    387,999   1.33%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders'
 equity              32,142     28,989  10.88%     32,142     28,989  10.88%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest earning
 assets             402,865    391,029   3.03%    402,865    391,029   3.03%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest bearing
 liabilities        338,417    333,404   1.50%    338,417    333,404   1.50%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets        439,824    429,431   2.42%    439,824    429,431   2.42%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Three      Three              Year       Year
                   months     months               to         to
                   ending     ending              date       date
Financial          Mar 31,    Mar 31,            Mar 31,    Mar 31,
 Ratios:            2014       2013     Change    2014       2013     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on
 average assets       0.65%      0.74%  (0.09)      0.65%      0.74%  (0.09)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on
 average equity       8.90%     11.02%  (2.12)      8.90%     11.02%  (2.12)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest
 margin               4.01%      4.06%  (0.05)      4.01%      4.06%  (0.05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Efficiency ratio     77.26%     72.28%   4.98      77.26%     72.28%   4.98
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average equity
 to average
 assets               7.31%      6.75%   0.56       7.31%      6.75%   0.56
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Three      Three              Year       Year
                   months     months               to         to
                   ending     ending              date       date
Allowance for      Mar 31,    Mar 31,            Mar 31,    Mar 31,
 loan losses:       2014       2013     Change    2014       2013     Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning
 balance         $   5,186  $   5,535   -6.31% $   5,186  $   5,535   -6.31%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for
 losses                 55        235  -76.60%        55        235  -76.60%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge-offs             (4)      (186) -97.85%        (4)      (186) -97.85%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recoveries              24         22    9.09%        24         22    9.09%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ending balance       5,261      5,606   -6.15%     5,261      5,606   -6.15%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonperforming         Mar 31,   Dec 31,           Mar 31,   Dec 31,
 assets:                2014      2013    Change    2013      2012    Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total nonperforming
 loans               $   3,283 $   3,066   7.08% $   6,040 $   6,346  -4.82%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other real estate
 owned                   1,714     1,451  18.13%     2,318     2,112   9.75%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total nonperforming
 assets                  4,997     4,517  10.63%     8,358     8,458  -1.18%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troubled debt
 restructurings -
 (performing
 portion)                  561       564  -0.53%       569       572  -0.52%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset quality         Mar 31,   Dec 31,           Mar 31,   Dec 31,
 ratios:                2014      2013    Change    2013      2012    Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonperforming loans
 to total loans          0.93%     0.89%   0.04      1.82%     1.95%  (0.12)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance for loan
 losses to total
 loans                   1.48%     1.50%  (0.02)     1.69%     1.70%  (0.00)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance for loan
 losses to
 nonperforming loans   160.25%   169.15%  (8.90)    92.81%    87.22%   5.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Add to Digg Bookmark with del.icio.us Add to Newsvine

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Latest Stories
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective ...
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrateg...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will w...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happe...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water,...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Want to enable self-service provisioning of application environments in minutes that mirror production? Can you automatically provide rich data with code-level detail back to the developers when issues occur in production? In his session at DevOps Summit, David Tesar, Microsoft Technical Evangelist on Microsoft Azure and DevOps, will discuss how to accomplish this and more utilizing technologies such as Microsoft Azure, Visual Studio online, and Application Insights in this demo-heavy session.
When an enterprise builds a hybrid IaaS cloud connecting its data center to one or more public clouds, security is often a major topic along with the other challenges involved. Security is closely intertwined with the networking choices made for the hybrid cloud. Traditional networking approaches for building a hybrid cloud try to kludge together the enterprise infrastructure with the public cloud. Consequently this approach requires risky, deep "surgery" including changes to firewalls, subnets...
DevOps is all about agility. However, you don't want to be on a high-speed bus to nowhere. The right DevOps approach controls velocity with a tight feedback loop that not only consists of operational data but also incorporates business context. With a business context in the decision making, the right business priorities are incorporated, which results in a higher value creation. In his session at DevOps Summit, Todd Rader, Solutions Architect at AppDynamics, discussed key monitoring techniques...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device exp...
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect...
High-performing enterprise Software Quality Assurance (SQA) teams validate systems that are ready for use - getting most actively involved as components integrate and form complete systems. These teams catch and report on defects, making sure the customer gets the best software possible. SQA teams have leveraged automation and virtualization to execute more thorough testing in less time - bringing Dev and Ops together, ensuring production readiness. Does the emergence of DevOps mean the end of E...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using ...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series dat...