Click here to close now.

SYS-CON MEDIA Authors: JP Morgenthal, AppDynamics Blog, John Wetherill, Harry Trott, Roger Strukhoff

News Feed Item

Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Terms and Agreements



 

 

 

LONDON, Aug. 27, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportbuyer.com has added a new market research report:

Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/1112622/Cancer-Monoclonal-Antibody-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

The Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the cancer monoclonal antibody partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.


Trends in cancer monoclonal antibody partnering deals
Disclosed headlines, upfronts, milestones and royalties by stage of development
Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering contract documents
Top cancer monoclonal antibody deals by value

The Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Agreements report provides an understanding and access to the cancer monoclonal antibody partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies.

The report provides an understanding and analysis of how and why companies enter cancer monoclonal antibody partnering deals. The majority of deals are discovery or development stage whereby the licensee obtains a right or an option right to license the licensors monoclonal antibody technology. These deals tend to be multicomponent, starting with collaborative R&D, and commercialization of outcomes. The report also includes antibody-drug conjugate deals and alliances.

Understanding the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered – contract documents provide this insight where press releases do not.

This report contains over 350 links to online copies of actual cancer monoclonal antibody deals and where available, contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their partners. Contract documents provide the answers to numerous questions about a prospective partner's flexibility on a wide range of important issues, many of which will have a significant impact on each party's ability to derive value from the deal.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report, whilst chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking since 2009, including details of average headline, upfront, milestone and royalty terms.

Chapter 3 provides a review of the leading cancer monoclonal antibody deals since 2009. Deals are listed by headline value, signed by big pharma, big biotech and most active of all biopharma companies. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract
.
Chapter 4 provides a comprehensive listing of the top 50 big pharma companies with deal announcement in cancer monoclonal antibody partnering, along with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of cancer monoclonal antibody deals, as well as contract documents available in the public domain. Where available, each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 5 provides a comprehensive listing of the top 50 big biotech companies with deal announcement in cancer monoclonal antibody partnering, along with a brief summary followed by a comprehensive listing of cancer monoclonal antibody deals, as well as contract documents available in the public domain. Where available, each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 6 provides a comprehensive and detailed review of cancer monoclonal antibody partnering deals signed and announced since January 2009. The chapter is organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc), specific therapy focus, and monoclonal antibody technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in cancer monoclonal antibody partnering and dealmaking since 2009.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of cancer monoclonal antibody technologies and products.


Report scope

Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Agreements is intended to provide the reader with an in-depth understanding and access to cancer monoclonal antibody trends and structure of deals entered into by leading companies worldwide.


Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Agreements includes:

Trends in cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking in the biopharma industry since 2009
Analysis of cancer monoclonal antibody deal structure
Access to headline, upfront, milestone and royalty data
Access to over 300 cancer monoclonal antibody deal records
The leading cancer monoclonal antibody deals by value since 2009


In Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Agreements, the available deals are listed by:

Company A-Z
Headline value
Stage of development at signing
Deal component type
Specific oncology therapy target
Monoclonal antibody type

Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Agreements report provides comprehensive access to available deals and contract documents for over 300 cancer monoclonal antibody deals. Analyzing actual contract agreements allows assessment of the following:

What are the precise rights granted or optioned?
What is actually granted by the agreement to the partner company?
What exclusivity is granted?
What is the payment structure for the deal?
How aresales and payments audited?
What is the deal term?
How are the key terms of the agreement defined?
How are IPRs handled and owned?
Who is responsible for commercialization?
Who is responsible for development, supply, and manufacture?
How is confidentiality and publication managed?
How are disputes to be resolved?
Under what conditions can the deal be terminated?
What happens when there is a change of ownership?
What sublicensing and subcontracting provisions have been agreed?
Which boilerplate clauses does the company insist upon?
Which boilerplate clauses appear to differ from partner to partner or deal type to deal type?
Which jurisdiction does the company insist upon for agreement law?
Executive Summary


Chapter 1 – Introduction

Chapter 2 – Trends in cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering over the years
2.3. Big pharma cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking activity
2.4. Big biotech cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking activity
2.5. Most active in cancer monoclonal antibody partnering
2.6. Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering by deal type
2.7. Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering by stage of development
2.8. Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering by cancer indication
2.9. Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering by antibody type
2.10. Disclosed deal terms for cancer monoclonal antibody partnering
2.10.1 Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering headline values
2.10.2 Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront payments
2.10.3 Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone payments
2.10.4 Cancer monoclonal antibody royalty rates

Chapter 3 – Leading cancer monoclonal antibody deals

3.1. Introduction
3.2. Top cancer monoclonal antibody deals by value

Chapter 4 – Big pharma cancer monoclonal antibody deals

4.1. Introduction

4.2. How to use big pharma partnering deals

4.3. Big pharma cancer monoclonal antibody partnering company profiles

Abbott
Abbvie
Actavis (formerly called Watson)
Amgen
Astellas
AstraZeneca
Bayer
Biogen Idec
Boehringer Ingelheim
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Celgene
Chugai Pharmaceutical
CSL
Daiichi Sankyo
Eli Lilly
Fresenius
Gilead Sciences
GlaxoSmithKline
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co
Merck KGaA
Mitsubishi Tanabe
Novartis
Novo Nordisk
Otsuka
Pfizer
Roche
Sanofi
Servier
Takeda
Teva
UCB
Chapter 5 – Big biotech cancer monoclonal antibody deals

5.1. Introduction

5.2. How to use big biotech partnering deals

5.3. Big biotech cancer monoclonal antibody partnering company profiles

Emergent BioSolutions
Genmab
LFB Group
Morphosys
PDL BioPharma
Seattle Genetics
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum

Chapter 6 – Cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking directory

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Company A-Z

6.3. By stage of development

Discovery
Formulation
Marketed
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Preclinical
Regulatory

6.4. By deal type

Asset purchase
Assignment
Bigpharma outlicensing
Co-development
Collaborative R&D
Co-market
Contract service
Co-promotion
CRADA
Cross-licensing
Development
Distribution
Equity purchase
Evaluation
Grant
Joint venture
Licensing
Loan
Manufacturing
Marketing
Material transfer
Option
Promotion
Research
Settlement
Spin out
Sub-license
Supply
Technology transfer
Termination

6.5. By oncology therapy area

Oncology
Bone cancer
Brain cancer
Breast cancer
Colorectal cancer
Gastric cancer
Head and neck cancer
Kidney cancer
Leukemia
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Acute myelogenous leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Lung cancer
Non small cell lung cancer
Lymphoma
Hodgkin's lymphoma
Non Hodgkin's lymphoma
Melanoma
Metastases
Multiple myeloma
Neuroblastoma
Ovarian cancer
Pancreatic cancer
Prostate cancer
Renal cell carcinoma
Solid tumors
Cancer pain
Thyroid cancer
6.6. By monoclonal antibody type
Chapter 7 –Partnering resource center
7.1. Online partnering
7.2. Partnering events
7.3. Further reading on dealmaking
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Deal type definitions
Appendix 2 – Example monoclonal antibody cancer partnering agreement
About Wildwood Ventures
Current Partnering
Current Agreements
Recent report titles from CurrentPartnering
Order Form – Upgrades for subscription access products
Order Form – Therapy Reports
Order Form – Technology Reports

Table of figures

Figure 1: Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering since 2009
Figure 2: Big pharma – top 50 – cancer monoclonal antibody deals 2009 to 2014
Figure 3: Big pharma cancer monoclonal antibody deal frequency – 2009 to 2014
Figure 4: Big biotech – top 50 – cancer monoclonal antibody deals 2009 to 2014
Figure 5: Big biotech cancer monoclonal antibody deal frequency – 2009 to 2014
Figure 6: Active cancer monoclonal antibody dealmaking activity– 2009 to 2014
Figure 7: Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering by deal type since 2009
Figure 8: Cancer monoclonal antibody partnering by stage of development since 2009
Figure 9: Monoclonal antibody partnering by oncology target since 2009
Figure 10: Monoclonal antibody partnering by type since 2009
Figure 11: Cancer monoclonal antibody deals with a headline value – by stage of development
Figure 12: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 13: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 14: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 15: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 16: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 17: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 18: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 19: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal headline value – median value by stage of development
Figure 20: Cancer monoclonal antibody deals with upfront payment values – by stage of development
Figure 21: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 22: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront value distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 23: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront value distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 24: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront value distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 25: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront value distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 26: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront value distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 27: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront value distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 28: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal upfront value – median value by stage of development
Figure 29: Cancer monoclonal antibody deals with milestone payment – by stage of development
Figure 30: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 31: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone value distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 32: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone value distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 33: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone value distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 34: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone value distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 35: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone value distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 36: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal milestone value distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 37: Cancer monoclonal antibody deals with royalty rates
Figure 38: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal royalty rate distribution, US$million – discovery stage
Figure 39: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal royalty rate value distribution, US$million – preclinical stage
Figure 40: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal royalty rate value distribution, US$million – phase I stage
Figure 41: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal royalty rate value distribution, US$million – phase II stage
Figure 42: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal royalty rate value distribution, US$million – phase III stage
Figure 43: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal royalty rate value distribution, US$million – regulatory stage
Figure 44: Cance monoclonal antibody deal royalty rate value distribution, US$million – marketed stage
Figure 45: Cancer monoclonal antibody deal royalty value – median value by stage of development
Figure 46: Top cancer monoclonal antibody deals by value since 2009
Figure 47: Online partnering resources
Figure 48: Forthcoming partnering events
Figure 49: Deal type definitions
Figure 50: Collaborative R&D agreement for BiTE antibodies against three undisclosed solid tumor targets



Read the full report:
Cancer Monoclonal Antibody Partnering Terms and Agreements

https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/1112622/Cancer-Monoclonal-Antibody-Partnering-Terms-and-Agreements.html

For more information:
Sarah Smith
Research Advisor at Reportbuyer.com
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 208 816 85 48
Website: www.reportbuyer.com

SOURCE ReportBuyer

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Latest Stories
From telemedicine to smart cars, digital homes and industrial monitoring, the explosive growth of IoT has created exciting new business opportunities for real time calls and messaging. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Ivelin Ivanov, CEO and Co-Founder of Telestax, shared some of the new revenue sources that IoT created for Restcomm – the open source telephony platform from Telestax. Ivelin Ivanov is a technology entrepreneur who founded Mobicents, an Open Source VoIP Platform, to help create, de...
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to evolve the way the world does business; however, understanding how to apply it to your company can be a mystery. Most people struggle with understanding the potential business uses or tend to get caught up in the technology, resulting in solutions that fail to meet even minimum business goals. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jesse Shiah, CEO / President / Co-Founder of AgilePoint Inc., showed what is needed to leverage the IoT to transform your business. ...
Grow your business with enterprise wearable apps using SAP Platforms and Google Glass. SAP and Google just launched the SAP and Google Glass Challenge, an opportunity for you to innovate and develop the best Enterprise Wearable App using SAP Platforms and Google Glass and gain valuable market exposure. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Brian McPhail, Senior Director of Business Development, ISVs & Digital Commerce at SAP, outlined the timeline of the SAP Google Glass Challenge and the opportunity...
As enterprises look to take advantage of the cloud, they need to understand the importance of safeguarding their confidential and sensitive data in cloud environments. Enterprises must protect their data from (i) system administrators who don't need to see the data in the clear and (ii) adversaries who become system administrators from stolen credentials. In short, enterprises must take control of their data: The best way to do this is by using advanced encryption, centralized key management and...
What are the benefits of using an enterprise-grade orchestration platform? In their session at 15th Cloud Expo, Nate Gordon, Director of Technology at Appcore, and Kedar Poduri, Senior Director of Product Management at Citrix Systems, took a closer look at the architectural design factors needed to support diverse workloads and how to run these workloads efficiently as a service provider. They also discussed how to deploy private cloud environments in 15 minutes or less.
In his session at DevOps Summit, Andrei Yurkevich, CTO at Altoros, provided an overview of all the benefits and opportunities, as well as drawbacks of deploying Cloud Foundry PaaS with Juju and compared it to BOSH. Discover the features that overlap, and understand what Juju Charm is, what it is not, where you use one or the other or where you use both BOSH and Juju Charms together. Andrei Yurkevich is Cloud Foundry protagonist and CTO at Altoros. Under his supervision, the Altoros engineering ...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water,...
For better or worse, DevOps has gone mainstream. All doubt was removed when IBM and HP threw up their respective DevOps microsites. Where are we on the hype cycle? It's hard to say for sure but there's a feeling we're heading for the "Peak of Inflated Expectations." What does this mean for the enterprise? Should they avoid DevOps? Definitely not. Should they be cautious though? Absolutely. The truth is that DevOps and the enterprise are at best strange bedfellows. The movement has its roots in t...
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrateg...
Can call centers hang up the phones for good? Intuitive Solutions did. WebRTC enabled this contact center provider to eliminate antiquated telephony and desktop phone infrastructure with a pure web-based solution, allowing them to expand beyond brick-and-mortar confines to a home-based agent model. It also ensured scalability and better service for customers, including MUY! Companies, one of the country's largest franchise restaurant companies with 232 Pizza Hut locations. This is one example of...
The true value of the Internet of Things (IoT) lies not just in the data, but through the services that protect the data, perform the analysis and present findings in a usable way. With many IoT elements rooted in traditional IT components, Big Data and IoT isn’t just a play for enterprise. In fact, the IoT presents SMBs with the prospect of launching entirely new activities and exploring innovative areas. CompTIA research identifies several areas where IoT is expected to have the greatest impac...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device exp...
There is little doubt that Big Data solutions will have an increasing role in the Enterprise IT mainstream over time. 8th International Big Data Expo, co-located with 17th International Cloud Expo - to be held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA - has announced its Call for Papers is open. As advanced data storage, access and analytics technologies aimed at handling high-volume and/or fast moving data all move center stage, aided by the cloud computing bo...
DevOps is the hottest moving target when it comes to software development methodologies. Many people fear that this fast-paced, barrier-breaking movement will leave information security best practices in the dust. Analysts provide recommendations to security professionals using bingo-laden terms like "moving security to the left" or "get a seat at the table." What we need are real-world examples and tactics for security practitioners to be part of DevOps. In his session at DevOps Summit, Andrew...
Containers Expo Blog covers the world of containers, as this lightweight alternative to virtual machines enables developers to work with identical dev environments and stacks. Containers Expo Blog offers top articles, news stories, and blog posts from the world's well-known experts and guarantees better exposure for its authors than any other publication. Bookmark Containers Expo Blog ▸ Here Follow new article posts on Twitter at @ContainersExpo