jhv1blz5 wrote: The article validated SOA as an IT architecture paradigm that can be leveraged in many ways. Taking data storage, scalability and application performance to a nifty level using SOA Application Grid infrastructure will no doubt enhance data and application performance on Oracle architecture platforms, it also has the promise of a cost effective and efficient IT delivery model. The very benefits of SOA.
CONSHOHOCKEN, PA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 02/28/07 -- Goldman Scarlato & Karon, P.C., a law firm
with offices in Pennsylvania and Ohio, announces that a lawsuit has been
filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York, on behalf of persons who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly
traded securities of Celestica, Inc. ("Celestica" or the "Company") (NYSE: CLS) between July 27, 2006 and December 12, 2006, inclusive (the "Class
Period"). The lawsuit was filed against Celestica and certain officers and
directors ("Defendants").
If you are a member of this class and wish to view a copy of a complaint
and join this class action, please e-mail us at info@gsk-law.com and
request a copy of the complaint and a plaintiff certification. If you are
a member of the Class, you may move the Court no later than March 13, 2007
to serve as a lead plaintiff for the Class. Any member of the purported
class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of
their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class
member. However, if you choose to remain an absent class member, unless
and until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel.
The complaint alleges that Defendants violated Section 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Company failed to disclose and
misrepresented that: (1) demand for products produced by its Information
Technology and Communications Divisions was declining due to a drop off in
orders placed by its key customers; (2) inventory at the Company's
Monterrey, Mexico facility built up to the level where much of it had to be
written off; (3) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls; and
(4) as a result, the Company's statements about its financial health and
future business prospects were lacking any reasonable basis.
On December 12, 2006, in contrast to its prior statements, the Company
announced that it was drastically lowering its financial guidance for the
fourth quarter of 2006. In reaction to this news, Celestica shares fell
$1.14 per share, or 12% to close on December 12, 2006 at $8.23 per share.
If you bought Celestica securities between July 27, 2006 and December 12,
2006, inclusive, and would like to obtain information about the lawsuit,
then you are invited to call (888) 753-2796 or email info@gsk-law.com to
speak with an advisor.