paul.nowak wrote: Matt, thanks for the comments. I made an error on the version of Plone. It's 2.5 Plone running on Zope 2.9x.
In regards to the additional products, we have a skin installed and we have a product that we had custom developed for us that connects to a PostgreSQL database. We've looked at slow PostgreSQL queries causing problems and have not been able to find an issue. We've also tested for the case where the PostgreSQL server is down and have not been able to create an issue. We therefor...
PITTSBURGH, PA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 05/03/07 -- Shareowners at Thursday's Verizon (NYSE: VZ)
Annual meeting in Pittsburgh are split, with 49% voting for and 49% voting
against a proposal on the Verizon proxy to give shareowners an Advisory
Vote on Executive Compensation (Item #6 on Verizon Proxy), according to
preliminary results.
This proxy asks the Verizon Board of Directors to include, as a voting item
at future annual meetings, an advisory resolution allowing shareowners to
approve or disapprove the executive compensation package of the company's
senior executive officers.
According to a Verizon press statement issued at the meeting, "The
preliminary results for the proposal on an advisory vote on senior
executive compensation are too close to determine whether the proposal
passed or was defeated. The outcome will be determined by the final
tabulation."
The "Say on Pay" proxy was put forth by Verizon's own retirees, led by C.
William Jones and members of the Association of BellTel Retirees Inc. This
is the tenth year that members of the Association (www.BellTelRetirees.org)
have proposed shareowner proxies to force corporate governance changes at
their former employer.
During that time period the 100,000-plus-member retiree group has served up
shareowner victories over the company in 2003, 2004 and 2005. The
non-profit retiree group was started in 1996 by just seven NYNEX retirees
to protect the pensions and benefits of company retirees and surviving
spouses.
According to Mr. Jones who also serves as President of the retiree
association, "This vote, regardless of the final outcome after the recount,
is a major moral victory for shareowners and the retirees of this company."
He added, "Long-term shareowners, believe that the owners of the company
should be able to express their approval or disapproval of the Board's
compensation package for the CEO and the other senior executives. An
advisory vote would provide useful feedback and encourage shareowners to
scrutinize the new, more extensive disclosures required by the SEC."
AP reports say that according to a company filing, Verizon Chairman and CEO
Ivan Seidenberg's 2006 compensation was valued at $20.2 million, including
salary, bonus, incentives, perks, above-market returns on deferred
compensation and the estimated value of stock options and awards granted
during the year. Over the five fiscal years through 2005, Mr. Seidenberg
received $75.1 million in total expected compensation, while total
shareholder return was negative 26.8%, according to the Corporate Library.
According to Institutional Shareholder Services, in the U.K. the required
shareholder advisory vote on compensation policies, "has proven a valuable
tool in encouraging companies to improve their practices... [and] has
contributed to a significant increase in constructive dialogue between
companies and directors."
Past Proxy Victories Versus Verizon:
In 2003 -- The retirees won 59% of the vote with an Executive Severance
Agreement proposal to limit overly generous executive compensation packages
and golden parachutes. At the time it was the first proxy loss by Verizon
or any other Bell System company in its 100-year history.
In 2003 -- Verizon agreed to implement another retiree proposal prior to
its annual shareholders meeting to exclude pension credits from the
calculation of executive compensation, which had gained 43% of shareholder
votes the previous year.
In 2004 -- The retirees were forced to come back at the company on the
Executive Severance Agreement proposal after Verizon failed to follow
shareholders' mandate to limit executive compensation packages and golden
parachutes. After retirees authored a new, binding proposal mandating the
change, Verizon relented, agreeing to seek shareholder approval for any
future Executive Severance Agreement more than 2.99 times an executive's
base salary and bonus.
In 2005 -- Before the company's proxy ballot went out to shareowners,
Verizon agreed to a retiree proxy's demand to reign-in Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) income for senior executives. Before this
change, executives received SERP contributions equal to 32% of their
combined base salary plus bonus for every dollar above $210,000 during
their first 20 years in the plan. In 2004 the payout amounted to $161
million and more than $400 million over three years, according to Verizon
estimates. The agreement negotiated by retiree leaders reduced these
excessive amounts including the 32 percent level down to a range of 4% to
7%.
Add to DiggBookmark with del.icio.usAdd to Newsvine
Contact:
Tom Butler
212-685-4600 Ext 6982 Email Contact