New Jersey's Gubernatorial Public Campaign Financing Program Must Combat New Threats from Independent Expenditures, Issue Advertising and Wealthy Candidates
New Jersey's Successful Legislative Public Financing Trials Should Be Expanded to All Legislative Districts
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 20 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Center for
Governmental Studies (CGS) today issued two reports analyzing New Jersey's
public campaign financing laws. The first, Public Campaign Financing in New
Jersey -- Governor: Weeding Out Big Money in the Garden State, analyzes the
nation's first public campaign financing program for gubernatorial elections,
enacted by New Jersey over 30 years ago, and recommends upgrades to improve
that program. The second, Public Campaign Financing in New Jersey --
Legislature: A Pilot Project Takes Flight, acknowledges the successes of New
Jersey's new clean elections program for select legislative elections and
recommends that the program be expanded to all state legislative races.
Successful for decades, New Jersey's gubernatorial public financing
program must now be upgraded to meet new challenges, concludes the new CGS
report. New Jersey created its public campaign financing system for governor
in the wake of corruption cases in the 1970s. In the 1980s, the legislature
increased the program's expenditure limits and added a debate requirement --
but that decade also saw the first signs of a depleted public financing fund.
The program is now threatened by a recent rise in large independent
expenditures and wealthy, self-financed candidates. In 2005, both general
election candidates opted out of the program for the first time since the
program's enactment in 1973.
Weeding Out Big Money in the Garden State recommends that New Jersey:
-- Increase the public funding and expenditure limits for gubernatorial
candidates facing wealthy or high-spending, non-participating opponents
and/or independent expenditures.
-- Track independent expenditures more accurately and use that information
to provide matching funds for participating candidates facing negative
independent expenditures and issue ads.
-- Expand the program to cover the new office of lieutenant governor.
-- Change the tax check-off from an "opt-in" to an "opt-out" program
and/or identify other sources of funding to maintain the program's
viability.
-- Expand the debate requirement to give voters more information about
candidates in an era when privately funded issue ads are taking over
the airwaves.
New Jersey's clean elections program for select legislative offices is now
a success and should be expanded to all candidates for the state legislature,
concludes the second report, Public Campaign Financing in New Jersey --
Legislature: A Pilot Project Takes Flight.
In 2004, thirty years after establishing the gubernatorial public campaign
financing program, New Jersey created an innovative pilot project that offered
full public campaign financing to candidates for legislative elections in
selected test districts. Initially unsuccessful, the pilot program's high and
restrictive qualification thresholds for the 2005 election prevented even
major party candidates from participating. In 2007, New Jersey revised,
simplified and expanded this pilot project, and 16 of 20 candidates in the
three legislative districts participating in the pilot project qualified for
public funding.
Bob Stern, President of the Center for Governmental Studies, said, "New
Jersey has done what no other state has attempted: used testing of pilot
projects to launch successfully a new system of legislative campaign
financing. The creation of a clean election program for all legislative
elections would be a significant step towards increasing competition in
legislative races and restricting the influence of large contributions on the
political process."
A Pilot Project Takes Flight recommends that, among other things, New
Jersey:
-- Make public financing available in all legislative districts, or at
least in selected competitive districts throughout the state, and
provide public funding in primary elections.
-- Create a process to determine whether "issue ads" support or oppose
specific candidates, and, when they do, provide those candidates with
additional funding to counter them.
-- Consider providing some public funding to third-party candidates.
Jessica Levinson, Director of Political Reform at CGS, said, "New Jersey
led the nation in public financing by establishing the first program for
gubernatorial elections 30 years ago. With additional improvements, the
state's admirable efforts to expand public financing to legislative elections
could once again lead the nation in the public campaign financing arena."
Weeding Out Big Money in the Garden State and A Pilot Project Takes
Flight, as well as other CGS reports, are available on the CGS website,
www.cgs.org. The JEHT Foundation provided generous funding for this report,
but it is not responsible for the statements or views expressed in the report.
The Center for Governmental Studies is a national non-profit, national
non-partisan organization that creates innovative political and media
solutions to help individuals participate more effectively in their
communities and governments.