So now someone at Google 'owns' Feedburner and all their feeds. And they could, if they wanted to, change the feeds to another format, overnight, without asking anyone. Reader software might have trouble working with it. They would say 'Oh but the new feeds work better with Google Reader, and that's the one most people use.' And by the way, more and more that's true these days. But what about other feed suppliers? Do they have to change to work with Google Reader? They will say no, but there may turn out to be practical reasons why they must.
Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1
#1
Feedburner News Desk commented on 22 Jul 2007
So now someone at Google 'owns' Feedburner and all their feeds. And they could, if they wanted to, change the feeds to another format, overnight, without asking anyone. Reader software might have trouble working with it. They would say 'Oh but the new feeds work better with Google Reader, and that's the one most people use.' And by the way, more and more that's true these days. But what about other feed suppliers? Do they have to change to work with Google Reader? They will say no, but there may turn out to be practical reasons why they must.
andy.mulholland wrote: intriguing !!!
We have full scale 'Mashup Factories' in Chicago USA and Utrecht Netherlands building enterprise MashUps for clients. These have full policy management capabilities and generally are mostly using intern...
Bill Miller wrote: Good article. Data Services is a great place to get value from SOA, and a great place to begin moving toward SOA. There are great open source tools for building SOA data services, including XAware.org. Bill Miller, XA...
Robert Morschel wrote: My mouth is watering already, though you do have to wonder at anything that claims to be a "lightweight Enterprise SOA Platform" ;-)
Robert
soaprobe.blogspot.com
/black-pixel.gif){kind=tracking}
.gif)
